318ti.org forum (http://www.318ti.org/forum/index.php)
-   Track, Auto-X & Drag Racing (http://www.318ti.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   Whats is the Hp for a stock 95ti (http://www.318ti.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5172)

jobimmer 04-14-2005 12:26 AM

Whats is the Hp for a stock 95ti
 
Does anyone know what the horse power and torque for a stock 95 ti?

bmwhartgeM3 04-14-2005 12:41 AM

isnt the HP something like 121 to the wheels?

m44ic 04-14-2005 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jobimmer
Does anyone know what the horse power and torque for a stock 95 ti?

the 95 has the m42 motor with obd1, Im not exactly sure so correct me if im wrong but I think that its about 115 whp 110 wtq. The hole flywheel hp and wheel hp confuses me why cant they just only measure it by wheel hp.

mickd 04-14-2005 12:44 AM

'95 318ti M42
Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm
Torque SAE net 129 lb-ft @ 4500rpm

m44ic 04-14-2005 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickd
'95 318ti M42
Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm
Torque SAE net 129 lb-ft @ 4500rpm

wow, MickD is that flywheel or wheel hp?

dodj 04-14-2005 12:51 AM

what about for the 1.9?

mickd 04-14-2005 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m44ic
wow, MickD is that flywheel or wheel hp?

At the flywheel

mickd 04-14-2005 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dodj
what about for the 1.9?

The M44 1.9L is:
Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm
Torque SAE net 133lb-ft @ 4300rpm

M42 bore and stroke:
84.0mm X 81.0mm

M44 Bore and stroke
85.0mm X 83.5mm

The M44's increase in torque is mainly due to the longer stroke. I personally prefer shorter stroke motors. The 1.8 16V Scirroco I owned reved so much faster than the 2.0 16V GTI that I had. I really didn't like that 2.0 16V VW motor, Loved the 1.8 16V VW motor. My buddy in Anaheim Hills 1.9 Z3 (M44) seemed slow compared to my '95 ti. They are both about the same weight.

jobimmer 04-14-2005 01:19 AM

Thanks for the info, I asked because I smoked a 97 Acura Integra w/intake and exaust i just thought they were faster than that.

dodj 04-14-2005 01:20 AM

so the 1.8 is faster than the 1.9 ti???

please explain, well you already did explain but i dont understand :(

mickd 04-14-2005 01:28 AM

The M42 has a forged crank and conventional rockers, the M44 has a cast crank and roller rockers. The M42's maximum engine speed is 6500rpm, the M44's 6350rpm. Just thought I'd post this as long as we're talking about our motors. Got all the numbers from R&T, the HP and torque match factory specs.

dodj 04-14-2005 01:30 AM

so in a straight line a 95 ti would be ahead?

mickd 04-14-2005 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jobimmer
Thanks for the info, I asked because I smoked a 97 Acura Integra w/intake and exaust i just thought they were faster than that.

That's great! I've beaten Integra's but not the R types, I'm all wound out in 2nd and have to shift and they go by pretty easily, with their high reving motors and high redline. I beat Civics pretty handily.

dodj 04-14-2005 01:34 AM

my friends prelude vtir beats me pretty easily

mickd 04-14-2005 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dodj
so the 1.8 is faster than the 1.9 ti???

please explain, well you already did explain but i dont understand :(

The 1.8 M42 sure feels better to me, seems to rev much easier, and that's what counts. I don't want to be flamed, but I would bet a stock '95 M42 would beat an M44, just the fact it revs better and has a higher redline would make me believe so.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM.

vBulletin Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, 318ti.org