View Single Post
Old 03-05-2010, 01:47 PM   #87
J!m
Moderator
 
J!m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bouncing off the rev limiter in CT!
Posts: 3,156
Vehicles
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluebimma View Post
1 square inch of radiator surface vs a cubic inch of engine displacement.
I don't doubt it works, it has been documented to have worked many times now. I recommend against it for maximum reliability. As the saying goes: "Your mileage may vary"

However you are a bit off on your radiator calculation. (and I am not sure how much, but...).

The radiator internal VOLUME may be only a cubic inch more; however the cooling surface area is SUBSTANTIALLY larger- all that folded aluminum between the (slightly longer) water pipes makes a BIG difference. The six radiator has a better ability to reject heat than the four.

Not starting a war; I just wanted everyone to understand that there is a more significant difference between the radiators in spite of their appearance.
__________________
"Speed's just a question of money. How fast you 'wanna go?"

Order Swap Manuals Here => http://www.318ti.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12912

WolferJ- gone but not forgotten. R.I.P.
J!m is offline   Reply With Quote