318ti.org forum

Go Back   318ti.org forum > Technical, Maintenance and Modifications > Air Filters/Intakes

Notices

Air Filters/Intakes Air filters and cold air intake systems.

.
» Recent Threads
The 318ti OBD-II engine...
10-19-2006 06:48 PM
Last post by Filiski120
04-24-2024 06:40 PM
210 Replies, 1,016,233 Views
Reply Share/Bookmark
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2005, 04:32 PM   #1
maherbaz
Senior Member
 
maherbaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 138
iTrader: (0)
Lightbulb factory restriction

I haven't fogged mine yet, but I am seriously considering it. I was going to this weekend while I had my car in my dad's garage (new bilsteins!). But I started thinking about possible reasons why bmw may have restricted the air flow. Go to the fogged airbox website:

http://www.logun.org/fog.htm

There is a chart of airflow for different RPMs. From 2.6-4K, the airflow remains unchanged. I spend a lot of time in this range. After 4K, airflow begins to increase slowly, but it does increase. Thats good. More power when you stomp it.

But it also begins increasing as RPMs drop below 2.6, and it looks like it is increasing pretty fast (much faster than it does on the high end). The chart cuts off everything before 2.2, but if we assume the numbers continue in the same manner, we can see the spread will be quite large as we approach idle speeds. I live in the city and have lots of traffic lights and I drive an automatic, so I spend a lot of time in the 0.8-2K range. But if my engine is sucking a lot more air at these ranges (when im not even trying for performance) that means it is using much more fuel.

So could fuel economy for daily driving situations be an additional reason for the restricted air flow (besides sound emissions)? I love the idea of getting more pull at higher RPMs, but in all reality I don't spend a lot of time above 4K; I might wind it up a couple times a day. I hate the idea of wasting all my gas idling at a stoplight.

Sorry to bring up the topic of fogging again, but I'm bored at work and enjoy thinking through things like this.
__________________
97 sport
maherbaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2005, 06:29 PM   #2
ScnStlr
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 30
iTrader: (0)
Default

Good observation. I think your right in your assesment from at least what I can see. I tried recently a CAI and I hated it (noise was way too much for my taste) and finally removed everything and reinstalled the old air box with a new K&N fitler.
I didn't notice any improvement in preformance but I am like you in my dirving. I also did not notice any gas mileage improvements or reductions.
I'm sticking with the normal air box. unless you are racing i don't think it's worth the effort or time.
ScnStlr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 PM.


.
Powered by site supporters
vBulletin Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, 318ti.org
© vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2
[page compression: 56.43 k/65.82 k (14.26%)]

318ti.org does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information or products discussed.