318ti.org forum

Go Back   318ti.org forum > Garage > Track, Auto-X & Drag Racing

Notices

Track, Auto-X & Drag Racing Discuss "organized" racing, car set-ups, driving techniques, track tips, events, driving schools, maintenance and more.

.
» Recent Threads
The 318ti OBD-II engine...
10-19-2006 06:48 PM
Last post by Filiski120
04-24-2024 06:40 PM
210 Replies, 997,000 Views
Reply Share/Bookmark
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2005, 12:26 AM   #1
jobimmer
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: san bernardino county
Posts: 34
iTrader: (0)
Default Whats is the Hp for a stock 95ti

Does anyone know what the horse power and torque for a stock 95 ti?
jobimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 12:41 AM   #2
bmwhartgeM3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mass
Posts: 186
iTrader: (0)
Default

isnt the HP something like 121 to the wheels?
bmwhartgeM3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 12:42 AM   #3
m44ic
Senior Member
 
m44ic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: madison, WI
Posts: 402
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobimmer
Does anyone know what the horse power and torque for a stock 95 ti?
the 95 has the m42 motor with obd1, Im not exactly sure so correct me if im wrong but I think that its about 115 whp 110 wtq. The hole flywheel hp and wheel hp confuses me why cant they just only measure it by wheel hp.
__________________
Mods: clear turn signals, Silverstar headlight bulbs, k&N custom CAI, removed A/C, lightened crank pulley, painted brakes, custom clutch stop, custom strut bar, x-brace, custom solid tranny mounts, Memphis sound system, Sachs sport clutch, B&M short shifter, lightened flywheel, redline MTL ....

Emberrassing honda owners one drive at a time

http://members.cardomain.com/mghockey
m44ic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 12:44 AM   #4
mickd
Senior Member
 
mickd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delafield, WI
Posts: 471
iTrader: (0)
Default

'95 318ti M42
Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm
Torque SAE net 129 lb-ft @ 4500rpm
mickd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 12:47 AM   #5
m44ic
Senior Member
 
m44ic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: madison, WI
Posts: 402
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickd
'95 318ti M42
Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm
Torque SAE net 129 lb-ft @ 4500rpm
wow, MickD is that flywheel or wheel hp?
__________________
Mods: clear turn signals, Silverstar headlight bulbs, k&N custom CAI, removed A/C, lightened crank pulley, painted brakes, custom clutch stop, custom strut bar, x-brace, custom solid tranny mounts, Memphis sound system, Sachs sport clutch, B&M short shifter, lightened flywheel, redline MTL ....

Emberrassing honda owners one drive at a time

http://members.cardomain.com/mghockey
m44ic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 12:51 AM   #6
dodj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: bris
Posts: 287
iTrader: (0)
Default

what about for the 1.9?
dodj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 12:55 AM   #7
mickd
Senior Member
 
mickd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delafield, WI
Posts: 471
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m44ic
wow, MickD is that flywheel or wheel hp?
At the flywheel
mickd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 01:15 AM   #8
mickd
Senior Member
 
mickd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delafield, WI
Posts: 471
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodj
what about for the 1.9?
The M44 1.9L is:
Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm
Torque SAE net 133lb-ft @ 4300rpm

M42 bore and stroke:
84.0mm X 81.0mm

M44 Bore and stroke
85.0mm X 83.5mm

The M44's increase in torque is mainly due to the longer stroke. I personally prefer shorter stroke motors. The 1.8 16V Scirroco I owned reved so much faster than the 2.0 16V GTI that I had. I really didn't like that 2.0 16V VW motor, Loved the 1.8 16V VW motor. My buddy in Anaheim Hills 1.9 Z3 (M44) seemed slow compared to my '95 ti. They are both about the same weight.
mickd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 01:19 AM   #9
jobimmer
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: san bernardino county
Posts: 34
iTrader: (0)
Default

Thanks for the info, I asked because I smoked a 97 Acura Integra w/intake and exaust i just thought they were faster than that.
jobimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 01:20 AM   #10
dodj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: bris
Posts: 287
iTrader: (0)
Default

so the 1.8 is faster than the 1.9 ti???

please explain, well you already did explain but i dont understand
dodj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 01:28 AM   #11
mickd
Senior Member
 
mickd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delafield, WI
Posts: 471
iTrader: (0)
Default

The M42 has a forged crank and conventional rockers, the M44 has a cast crank and roller rockers. The M42's maximum engine speed is 6500rpm, the M44's 6350rpm. Just thought I'd post this as long as we're talking about our motors. Got all the numbers from R&T, the HP and torque match factory specs.
mickd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 01:30 AM   #12
dodj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: bris
Posts: 287
iTrader: (0)
Default

so in a straight line a 95 ti would be ahead?
dodj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 01:33 AM   #13
mickd
Senior Member
 
mickd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delafield, WI
Posts: 471
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobimmer
Thanks for the info, I asked because I smoked a 97 Acura Integra w/intake and exaust i just thought they were faster than that.
That's great! I've beaten Integra's but not the R types, I'm all wound out in 2nd and have to shift and they go by pretty easily, with their high reving motors and high redline. I beat Civics pretty handily.
mickd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 01:34 AM   #14
dodj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: bris
Posts: 287
iTrader: (0)
Default

my friends prelude vtir beats me pretty easily
dodj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 01:39 AM   #15
mickd
Senior Member
 
mickd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delafield, WI
Posts: 471
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodj
so the 1.8 is faster than the 1.9 ti???

please explain, well you already did explain but i dont understand
The 1.8 M42 sure feels better to me, seems to rev much easier, and that's what counts. I don't want to be flamed, but I would bet a stock '95 M42 would beat an M44, just the fact it revs better and has a higher redline would make me believe so.
mickd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Fog Delete Panels, 2007 A/C compressor, M3 Black leather boots RidingSimple US and North America 1 11-20-2008 06:29 PM
license plate delete b.u.ti-ful US and North America 10 12-07-2007 09:03 PM
OBDII EWS delete mooseheadm5 Engine Swaps 12 03-28-2007 08:30 PM
LICENSE PLATE DELETE YourNameHere US and North America 1 12-06-2006 07:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 AM.


.
Powered by site supporters
vBulletin Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, 318ti.org
© vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2
[page compression: 111.09 k/134.17 k (17.20%)]

318ti.org does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information or products discussed.