» Site Navigation | | » Recent Threads | | | | | | | 04-14-2005, 12:26 AM | #1 | Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: san bernardino county Posts: 34 | Whats is the Hp for a stock 95ti Does anyone know what the horse power and torque for a stock 95 ti? | | | 04-14-2005, 12:41 AM | #2 | Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: mass Posts: 186 | isnt the HP something like 121 to the wheels? | | | 04-14-2005, 12:42 AM | #3 | Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: madison, WI Posts: 402 | Quote: Originally Posted by jobimmer Does anyone know what the horse power and torque for a stock 95 ti? | the 95 has the m42 motor with obd1, Im not exactly sure so correct me if im wrong but I think that its about 115 whp 110 wtq. The hole flywheel hp and wheel hp confuses me why cant they just only measure it by wheel hp. __________________ Mods: clear turn signals, Silverstar headlight bulbs, k&N custom CAI, removed A/C, lightened crank pulley, painted brakes, custom clutch stop, custom strut bar, x-brace, custom solid tranny mounts, Memphis sound system, Sachs sport clutch, B&M short shifter, lightened flywheel, redline MTL .... Emberrassing honda owners one drive at a time http://members.cardomain.com/mghockey | | | 04-14-2005, 12:44 AM | #4 | Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Delafield, WI Posts: 471 | '95 318ti M42 Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm Torque SAE net 129 lb-ft @ 4500rpm | | | 04-14-2005, 12:47 AM | #5 | Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: madison, WI Posts: 402 | Quote: Originally Posted by mickd '95 318ti M42 Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm Torque SAE net 129 lb-ft @ 4500rpm | wow, MickD is that flywheel or wheel hp? __________________ Mods: clear turn signals, Silverstar headlight bulbs, k&N custom CAI, removed A/C, lightened crank pulley, painted brakes, custom clutch stop, custom strut bar, x-brace, custom solid tranny mounts, Memphis sound system, Sachs sport clutch, B&M short shifter, lightened flywheel, redline MTL .... Emberrassing honda owners one drive at a time http://members.cardomain.com/mghockey | | | 04-14-2005, 12:51 AM | #6 | Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: bris Posts: 287 | what about for the 1.9? | | | 04-14-2005, 12:55 AM | #7 | Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Delafield, WI Posts: 471 | Quote: Originally Posted by m44ic wow, MickD is that flywheel or wheel hp? | At the flywheel | | | 04-14-2005, 01:15 AM | #8 | Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Delafield, WI Posts: 471 | Quote: Originally Posted by dodj what about for the 1.9? | The M44 1.9L is: Power SAE net 138bhp @ 6000rpm Torque SAE net 133lb-ft @ 4300rpm M42 bore and stroke: 84.0mm X 81.0mm M44 Bore and stroke 85.0mm X 83.5mm The M44's increase in torque is mainly due to the longer stroke. I personally prefer shorter stroke motors. The 1.8 16V Scirroco I owned reved so much faster than the 2.0 16V GTI that I had. I really didn't like that 2.0 16V VW motor, Loved the 1.8 16V VW motor. My buddy in Anaheim Hills 1.9 Z3 (M44) seemed slow compared to my '95 ti. They are both about the same weight. | | | 04-14-2005, 01:19 AM | #9 | Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: san bernardino county Posts: 34 | Thanks for the info, I asked because I smoked a 97 Acura Integra w/intake and exaust i just thought they were faster than that. | | | 04-14-2005, 01:20 AM | #10 | Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: bris Posts: 287 | so the 1.8 is faster than the 1.9 ti??? please explain, well you already did explain but i dont understand | | | 04-14-2005, 01:28 AM | #11 | Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Delafield, WI Posts: 471 | The M42 has a forged crank and conventional rockers, the M44 has a cast crank and roller rockers. The M42's maximum engine speed is 6500rpm, the M44's 6350rpm. Just thought I'd post this as long as we're talking about our motors. Got all the numbers from R&T, the HP and torque match factory specs. | | | 04-14-2005, 01:30 AM | #12 | Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: bris Posts: 287 | so in a straight line a 95 ti would be ahead? | | | 04-14-2005, 01:33 AM | #13 | Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Delafield, WI Posts: 471 | Quote: Originally Posted by jobimmer Thanks for the info, I asked because I smoked a 97 Acura Integra w/intake and exaust i just thought they were faster than that. | That's great! I've beaten Integra's but not the R types, I'm all wound out in 2nd and have to shift and they go by pretty easily, with their high reving motors and high redline. I beat Civics pretty handily. | | | 04-14-2005, 01:34 AM | #14 | Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: bris Posts: 287 | my friends prelude vtir beats me pretty easily | | | 04-14-2005, 01:39 AM | #15 | Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Delafield, WI Posts: 471 | Quote: Originally Posted by dodj so the 1.8 is faster than the 1.9 ti??? please explain, well you already did explain but i dont understand | The 1.8 M42 sure feels better to me, seems to rev much easier, and that's what counts. I don't want to be flamed, but I would bet a stock '95 M42 would beat an M44, just the fact it revs better and has a higher redline would make me believe so. | | | | | Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | Posting Rules | You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |